Subscriptions Versus Downloaded Software On Mac
Automatically update apps Our Automatic Software Updater feature searches online for updates to the most popular apps on your PC and then installs them automatically to help prevent security vulnerabilities. Reduce security risks by keeping your other apps up-to-date. Yes: yes: yes.
Although I am a professional reviewer of cybersecurity programs, I love photography too. I really wish I had the ability to click photographs like professionals. Unfortunately, I have extremely limited ideas about aperture and shutter speed settings.
Sometimes, I contemplate between shooting photographs using the natural light available or using one or multiple flash units to click the best pictures. The result is that I typically end up with rather disappointing photographs.
Hence I was surprised, when one of my friends who happens to use the same camera as I do, shot a much better picture of the same scene that I did, using the same camera and light settings. When I asked him how this was possible, he replied that he depended on photo enhancing software.
After searching online for photo enhancing programs, I decided to try Photolemur and Perfectly Clear… the two leading programs in this segment.
Find below my analysis of Photolemur vs Perfectly Clear 2020. This will help budding photographers decide which one of those two programs is suitable for them.
You can also see how Photolemur compares with yet another big player in photo editing with artificial intelligence.
Photolemur 3 vs Perfectly Clear
Both programs are some of the best professional picture editing and enhancing software that you can ever come across. This is more so when you are looking for very good photo editors that make use of ‘artificial intelligence'.
Photolemur
As with any other program, I prefer giving higher rankings to those that offer a trial version. When I visited the website of Photolemur, I found that there was no mention of a trial version.
Does windows 10 linked inbox affect mac mail app download. A linked inbox lets you view emails from multiple accounts within a single folder. The feature has been a built-in part of the Windows 10 Mail app since late 2015 and is available on both the. Jul 22, 2015 Setting Up Mail in Windows 10 If you've already set up the default Windows Mail app on a Windows 8.x PC, you're done as soon as you link the PC with your Windows account. I've found this one of. Microsoft has been updating the Windows 10 Mail & Calendar app over the past few months. One of the nicer upgrades is the ability to combine multiple email accounts by linking them together so you can read, reply and manage relevant emails from one place. We show you how to create linked inboxes in Mail. Dec 18, 2015 Mail app is one of revamped built-in apps for Windows 10. It's completely rewritten and packed with features that help you manage e-mails easily. As a Universal app, it shares the bits with its mobile version. If you don't know yet, the Mail app on Windows Phone has been known for its ability to link inboxes into a single inbox. That means whenever you open the app, you can see e-mails from.
Pricing
The vendor was offering the full version for $35, which is quite reasonable considering the features mentioned on their website.
Good Testimonials
Judging by the testimonials left by their users, this seems to be an awesome photo editing software. The vendors claim that it uses “artificial intelligence” to detect flaws in the image(s) and fixes them within a couple of seconds.
Works Fast on Windows and Mac
Available for both Windows and Macintosh operating programs, this editor works on Windows 7, 8, and 10 as well as Mac El Capitan, Sierra, and High Sierra.
One can find out other specifications such as minimum memory required, graphics cards, and the free disk space on their website.
A Variety of Great Features
The user requires an internet connection for validation of subscriptions, software activation, and access to online services. I decided to purchase the software, as it gives me access to many more features that require mentioning in order to do justice to this Photolemur versus Perfectly Clear comparison.
Purchasing, Installation, and Testing
Clicking on the “buy now” button redirected my browser to a form in which I had to provide my details such as full name, country, state/province, and email ID.
There is another option where you can select whether you are planning to use the program as an individual or for a company. In the case of the latter, you have to also include the company's name, address, and some other fields.
You also have the option of selecting the number of licenses you require.
Select one of the several payment options, complete the payment process, and you shall receive the download link as well as the activation serial number via email.
My Experience
I downloaded the software, installed it on my computer and started putting it through its paces. Using the program was a piece of cake. Simply drag and drop your photograph into the software's windows and let the program complete its magic.
Photo Effects
Photolemur offers about 11 types of corrections such as:
• Raw file processing
• Tint perfection
• Smart dehaze
• Sky enhancement
• Noise reduction
• Color recovery
• Face retouching
• Exposure compensation
• Natural light correction
• JPG fix, and
• Foliage enhancement
A Glimpse of How it Works
You can also watch how these functions work on their website by selecting a picture and sliding the vertical bar from left to right with your mouse pointer. If you move this bar to the center of the screen, you can see the comparison between the original image and the corrected photograph.
Facial Enhancements
Their new “Face Finish” technology automatically whitens teeth, smoothens skin, enhances eyes, and removes imperfections from your photographs with a single click of the mouse button.
The software employs artificial intelligence by analyzing millions of details and fixing the errors therein with complex adjustments.
I tried out this feature on one of my photographs and was surprised by the results. The image looked as if it was shot by a professional photographer. I could have achieved the same result with Photoshop, but it would have taken me hours. However, Photolemur completed the process in a couple of seconds.
Can Process Images in Batches
The software also has a batch processing facility, which allows users to apply a particular filter on multiple images at the same time. Photography enthusiasts know that black and white images have a special look about them, which can never be achieved with color photography. I could achieve this effect with one of the several styles that Photolemur offers. They include:
• Apollo
• Mono
• Evolve
• Fall
• Spirited, and
• Noble
Simply select the photographs you want to apply the style on and click the mouse button to get the desired results. If you are not sure what these styles do, drag an image on the software and click on the different styles to view how your picture will look like after applying it.
Split-screen Feature
This split-screen feature is really outstanding as it permits me to see how the enhanced image will look like before I click on the process button.
Converting A Color Picture to Black and White
The Result
It would be an injustice to compare Photolemur and Perfectly Clear without mentioning that the resultant format of the edition is RAW, which is one of the most complete format, even better than JPG. It results in edited photographs of aesthetic excellence and high quality.
Ideal for Both Novice and Professional Photographers
I strongly recommend this software to all photo enthusiasts to touch up their photographs. In fact, even seasoned professionals will appreciate this software and use it to further enhance the quality of their photographs.
Processing speed will take time on computers that do not have adequate memory or a fast processor as processing photographs in the RAW format takes a lot of time. I wish the developers also included features such as adding textures, colors, and layers to the photograph. Including these features would make Photolemur more powerful than Photoshop.
A One-time Fee
The simplicity of use and the low price were two of the main factors that I loved the best in this photo editing software. Those who had used an older version of this program will remember that it was subscription-based. However, that is a thing of the past, and you only have to pay a one-time fee to purchase the program and use it for eternity.
Photolemur or Perfectly Clear
As mentioned earlier, I decided to try Perfectly Clear too. As the vendor of this program also mentions “artificial intelligence” on their website, I decided to evaluate Photolemur vs Perfectly clear AI as well.
Perfectly Clear
Split Image Bar
Their website has the same split image vertical bar that allows you to see how the image looks before processing and how it looks post-processing.
Initially, this program was only available as a plugin for Photoshop. However, the vendor is now offering it as standalone software.
About the Free Version of Perfectly Clear
You can sign up for a free version of Perfectly Clear by filling up their online form. The catch is that the free version is not standalone and is only available as a plugin for Photoshop.
A Higher Cost
As I wanted to compare it with the standalone version of Photolemur, I had no options apart from opting for a paid copy. Unfortunately, the cost of Perfectly Clear, at $129, is much more than that of Photolemur.
According to the vendor, their program depends on “intelligent image analysis”, which allows it to find camera flaws and limitations and fix them automatically. Like Photolemur, the processing is done automatically. Just load the picture you want to edit on the program, and enhance it with a couple of clicks of the mouse button.
Available for Windows and Mac
It is available for both the Macintosh and Windows operating systems.
It offers a wide range of image-enhancing features such as:
• Image ambulance (you can use this to recover an underexposed or overexposed image with up to five different stops)
• Sky enhancer (this feature allows you to add “saturation” to a particular channel, and boost yellow, red, and blue colors in the image)
• Foliage enhancer (very much like the above, but allows you to boost browns and greens in your picture)
• Color vibrancy (use this feature to boost the intensity of all of the colors in the image. You can also use it to prevent over saturation to skin tones)
• Black point (an excellent setting, which permits you to alter the range of pixels to which you want to apply your exposure changes)
The above features are for landscapes.
The vendor has also included several features for portrait images too, which include:
• Adjusting control points and adding a face manually. The auto face detection in the older version of Perfectly Clear did not find the faces in the image on all occasions. With the latest version of the program, the vendor has enhanced the face detection functionality, which permits you to apply beautification alterations to all faces in the photograph.
• Color fidelity and light diffusion now feature strength adjustment filters.
• Lip sharpening… the controls have been improved allowing you total control over strength with either coarse, medium, or fine methods.
• Blush… make cosmetic changes to your picture by adding blush colors from one of the 12 popular built-in shades or even create your custom shade.
• Skin tone… the software provides you with five different modes to adjust the skin tones of a picture.
• Skin smoothening… apply skin smoothening on the entire body or just the face using three different modes super smooth, default, and subtle.
• Click to zoom… I loved this excellent feature that permitted me to zoom into a part of the image. By blowing up a section of the picture, it is possible to see the results of the beautifications.
Is Perfectly Clear Better Than Photolemur?
I would not go as far as stating that Perfect Clear is better than Photolemur. Both of them have their individual features which make them stand apart from the other.
The vendors of Perfectly Clear have changed certain features in their program that allows for easier navigation. They have shifted the presets on the top of the screen and the corrections on a collapsible panel on the right. You can collapse this panel to get more working space on the screen. It is possible to rearrange the presets by dragging and dropping them.
The vendor also offers this software as a stand-alone or as a plugin for Photoshop. There are several additional presets too such as:
• Exposure
• Highlight recovery
• Fill light
• White balance
• Temperature
• Tint, and
• Lens correction
The Filmstrip included with the latest version of Perfectly Clear permits users to effortlessly navigate the main presets as well as the new looks, allowing you to see what changes in the image the presets will make.
How Fast Are the Picture Previews?
This software renders previews quite quickly, but not as blazingly fast as that of Photolemur. The latest version allows you to know how your presets will look without applying them.
There are some additional controls such as:
• Robust color restoration and color casts
• Stylistic vignette and radical filters
• Graduated filters, and
• Manual finishing controls
Which Photo Enhancer is Better?
After going through the different features, I would like to conclude this comparison and voice my opinion regarding Photolemur compared to Perfectly Clear to determine which is best.
My vote goes to Photolemur, a Perfectly Clear alternative, which might not offer as many on-screen controls as the latter. However, the artificial intelligence of Photolemur stands apart from Perfectly Clear. I did not have to navigate through so many different filters and settings to complete the job.
Just drag and drop your photographs and Photolemur will take care of the rest automatically in no time.
Is Photolemur Better Than Perfectly Clear?
Although both of these photo editing programs delivered excellent results, considering the ease of use and the price factor, I would not hesitate to say that Photolemur has a distinct edge over Perfectly Clear.
With big name, traditionally boxed products like Microsoft Office and Adobe’s Creative Suite turning to new subscription licensing models we, as IT pros, have to look into this model and determine if and when it is right for our businesses. In some cases, like with MS Office, we have choices to buy boxed products, volume license deals, or subscription licenses. This is very flexible and allows us to consider many alternatives. With Adobe, however, non-subscription options have been dropped and if we want to use their product line, subscription pricing is our only option. As we move forward this will be a growing trend and something that the industry must face and understand. It cannot be avoided easily.
First we should understand why subscription models are good for the vendors. Many people, especially in IT, assume that subscriptions are designed to extract higher fees from customers and certainly any given vendor may raise prices in conjunction with changing models, but fundamentally, subscription pricing is purely a licensing approach and does not imply and increase in cost. It may, potentially, even mean a decrease.
Software vendors like subscription pricing for three key reasons.
The first is license management. With traditional software purchases it was easy for customers to install multiple copies, perhaps accidentally, of software, which can cause a loss of revenue for vendors if the software was used but not licensed. License management was traditionally complicated and expensive for all parties involved. Moving to subscription models makes it very easy to clearly communicate licensing requirements and to enforce policies.
For customers purchasing software, this change is actually beneficial as it lowers the overall cost of software because it helps to eliminate illegitimate uses of software. By lowering the piracy rate the cost that needs to be passed on to legitimate businesses can be lowered. Whether this turns into lower cost for customers or higher margins for vendors, it is a benefit to all of the legitimate parties involved.
In traditional software and support models, customers might use old versions of software for many years resulting in many different versions, which would require support of multiple versions from vendors. Often, this would mean that support teams need extensive training for a long tail of legacy customers or separate support groups would be needed for different software versions. This was extremely expensive as support is a key cost in software development.
Subscriptions Versus Downloaded Software On Mac Computer
Likewise, development teams would be forced to be split, with most resources focusing on developing or fixing the current software version while some developers would be forced to spend time patching and maintaining legacy versions that were no longer being sold. These costs were often enormous and meant that great energy was being spent to support customers who were not investing in new software and came at the expense of resources for improving the software and support for the best customers. The move to subscription licensing generally eliminates support needs for legacy versions as all customers move to the latest versions all of the time.
Again, this is a move that greatly benefits both the vendor and good customers. It only sometimes is a negative to customers who were relying on being “expensive to maintain” customers who used old software for a long time rather than updating. But commonly even those customers benefit from not running old software, even if this is not how they would operate if they had their druthers. The benefits to the vendor and to “good” customers is very large, the penalty to customers that were formally not profitable is generally very small.
The third reason, which is really a combination of the above, is that customers who previously depended on buying a single version of a product and continuing to use it for a very long time, likely many years past the end of support, are effectively eliminated. These customers, lacking a means to buy in this traditional manner, are normally either lost as customers (which is not a financial loss as they were not very profitable) or they convert to higher profit customers, even if begrudgingly. This makes vendors very happy – separating the wheat from the chaff, so to speak. This way vendors cut loose customers that are not making them money and create more customers that are making them money.
Now that we have seen why vendors like this model and why we are likely to see more and more of it in the future as large, which leads vendors to both demonstrate the financial value of the change and condition customers to think in terms of subscription license models, we will look at why IT departments and businesses should consider embracing this model for their own reasons.
To the business itself, subscription licensing offers some significant value, especially to finance departments. Through moving to subscription licensing we are generally able to move from capital expenses (capex) to operational expenses (opex) which is generally seen as favorable. But subscription value is far larger than that. Subscription pricing gives cost predictability. A finance department can accurately predict their costs over time rarely being surprised, whereas, in the old approach, software was largely forgotten and then some need would require an old package to be updated and suddenly a very large invoice would be forthcoming with potentially very little warning (often followed by large re-training expenses due to the possibly large gap in software versions.)
With subscription pricing, costs normally fluctuate fluidly with employee count. As new employees are hired the finance department can predict exactly how much they will cost. And when employees leave, subscriptions can be discontinued and cost reduced. Only software that is truly used is purchased. The need to overbuy to account for fluctuations or predicted growth no longer exists. Subscription licensing also leverages the time-value of money allowing businesses to hold onto their funds for as long as possible requiring them to pay only for what they use as they use it.
Free layout design software. Design the Kitchen of Your Dreams. Want to design your own kitchen like a Pro? With the Lowe’s Virtual Room Designer, you can turn your vision into reality. The Kitchen Layout Tool lets you become a virtual kitchen designer so you can easily create a beautiful yet functional kitchen. This practical tool allows you to design a kitchen. When you are trying to design a room or house, then you will have to visualize the designs in 3D to make sure that everything goes along and will be appealing. This can be done with the help of certain home designer architectural software which will render the design in a realistic way. Some of the sketch software for mac can be used for free and is very easy to use. Oct 09, 2017 If you want to draw up a new floor plan for your home, office or just about any kind of space, we’ve taken a look at the very best Mac compatible floor plan and home design software in 2020. Floor planners are an easy to map out new layouts making it easier to identify problems, save time on costly errors and visualize your ideas more clearly. Use with shift to 'Save As.' Ctrl+Z Undo last action Ctrl+Y Redo last action R, L Rotate selected item by 15°. With shift key rotation angle will downscaled to 5° +, - Canvas zoom in/out X Display debugging info 2D view Shift + ←↑→↓ Move objects gently ←↑→↓ Move objects P Enable drawing mode S Split selected wall.
For IT the benefits are even greater. IT should benefit from having a better relationship with finance and human resources as the costs and needs of incoming or outgoing users are better understood. This eliminates some of the friction between these departments which is always beneficial.
IT also benefits from the effective enforcement of best practices. It is common for IT departments to struggle to convince businesses to invest in newer versions of software, which often results in support issues and unnecessary complexity and less than happy users. With subscription pricing, IT is constantly supplied with the latest software for users, which, in nearly all cases, is an enormous benefit both to IT and to the users of the software. This eliminates much of the friction that IT experiences with the business and with management by moving the need for updates to an external mandate and no longer something that IT or the users must request.
IT benefits from easier license management on their end as well. It is generally far easier to determine license availability and need. Audits are unnecessary because the licensing process is generally handled (generally, nothing technically requires this) via an authentication mechanism with the vendor, which means that unless specific effort is taken to violate licensing (cracking software or some other extreme measure) that licensing accidents are unlikely and easy to correct.
IT may also benefit from easier ability to handle complex licensing situations such as providing a higher feature set level for one user and not for another. Licenses can often be purchased at a minimum level and upgraded if more needs are discovered. The ability to easily customize per user and over time means that IT can deliver more value with less effort.
Many of the objections with subscription licensing are not actually with subscription licensing itself. Often it is a perception of higher cost. This is, of course, difficult to prove since any given company may choose to charge anything that they want for different license options. Microsoft offers both subscription and non-subscription license options for some of their key products such as MS Office. This gives us a chance to see how they see the cost differences and benefits and to compare the options so that we can find the most cost effective option for our own business. By keeping both models, Microsoft can be audited by their customers to keep costs of each model in line. However, by offering both they also lose many of the benefits that pure subscription models bring such as needing to support only a single version at a time.
Adobe, on the other hand, made the switch from traditional licensing to subscription licensing basically all at once and appears to have decided to raise their prices at the same time. This is very misleading because Adobe actually raised the price, and it is not the subscription model creating the price increase. The benefits of subscription pricing are benefits of the model. The pricing decisions of any given vendor are a separate thing and must be evaluated in the same way that any pricing evaluation is done.
The other common complaint that I have heard many times is an inability to “own” software. This is a natural reaction but one that IT and business units should not have. In a business setting, software is not owned by people and we should have no emotional ties to it. Software is just another tool for completing our work and whatever gives us the best ability to do that, at the best price, is what we want. From a purely business perspective, owning software is irrelevant. The desire to own things is a human reaction that is not conducive to good business thinking. It is also very valuable to point out that IT should never have this mental reaction to owning software – it is the business, not the IT department or the IT professionals, who own software in their business. IT is simply selecting, deploying, configuring, and managing the software on behalf of the business that it supports.
Overall I truly believe that subscription licensing models are good, in general, for nearly everyone involved. They benefit vendors in such a way that it enables them to be more viable and profitable, while making it easier for IT departments to deliver better value to their users often while enforcing many best practices that businesses would otherwise be tempted to avoid. The improved profitability may also encourage vendors to pursue niche software titles that would have been previously unaffordable to create and support. Vendors, IT, and end users are nearly universal winners while businesses face the only real grey area where pricing may or may not be beneficial to them in this model.
Photo credit: George Thomas via Flickr